Higher-dimensional forcing -------------------- Bernhard Irrgang

personal homepage

university homepage

3 D forcing

young set theory

photos

Three-dimensional applications

Let X be a topological space. Its spread is defined by

spread(X ) = sup{card(D ) | D discrete subspace of X}.

Theorem (Hajnal,Juhasz - 1967)
If X is a Hausdorff space, then card(X) 22spread(X) .

In his book ”Cardinal functions in topology”(1971), Juhasz explicitly asks if the second exponentiation is really necessary. This was answered by Fedorcuk (1975).

Theorem
In L, there exists a 0-dimensional Hausdorff (and hence regular) space with spread ω of size ω2 = 22spread(X) .

This is a consequence of (and GCH).

There was no such example for the case spread(X) = ω1. Three-dimensional forcing yields the following:

Theorem
If there is a simplified (ω1,2)-morass, then there exists a ccc forcing of size ω1 which adds a 0-dimensional Hausdorff space X of size ω3 with spread ω1.

Hence there exists such a forcing in L. By the usual argument for Cohen forcing, it preserves GCH. So the existence of a 0-dimensional Hausdorff space with spread ω1 and size 22spread(X) is consistent.

Motivation

Two-dimensional applications

Open Problems

Morasses / Example